Skip to content
C-Neutral Enersol Limited
Small wind turbine and solar array at a ridgeline homestead

Residential · Wind + Solar Hybrid

Kabale Ridgeline Homestead

Two generators that fail at different times.

Location
Kabale
Scale
3 kW wind + 4 kWp PV
Commissioned
2023
Wind turbine
3 kWWind turbine
Solar array
4 kWpSolar array
Smaller battery than solar-only
~1/3Smaller battery than solar-only
Generator run hours
ZeroGenerator run hours

Figures are representative of work delivered in this sector and are rounded. Full project documentation available on request.

01 — The brief

What we walked into

A wind-and-solar hybrid on an exposed ridgeline site, where the wind resource was strong enough to genuinely justify a turbine. Wind carries the nights and the wet season; solar carries the bright middle of the day. The generator has not run since.

An off-grid homestead on a ridge, running a generator nightly and through the long overcast stretches of the wet season — exactly when a solar-only system struggles most. Solar alone would have needed a very large and expensive battery to survive those weeks. The question was whether the site’s wind was real or merely felt strong on the day of the visit.

02 — The approach

What we engineered

We assessed the wind resource properly, because that assessment is a gate, not a formality — a turbine on a sheltered plot is an expensive ornament. The mean speed and the prevailing flow justified a machine. We specified a 3 kW turbine on a tower tall enough to reach clean air above the terrain-induced turbulence, alongside 4 kWp of solar, both feeding one battery bank through their own controllers. The tower has a hinged base so the turbine lowers to ground level for service instead of being climbed.

Engineering detail

  • Wind assessment treated as a gate — we advise against where the resource is weak
  • Tower height set to reach clean air above terrain turbulence
  • Hinged tower base: turbine lowers for service rather than being climbed
  • One battery bank, two controllers, complementary generation profiles
  • Battery ~1/3 smaller than solar-only would have needed

03 — The result

What it delivers now

The two sources cover each other almost exactly: wind is strongest overnight and through the wet season, solar through the dry, bright hours. The combined profile is flat enough that the battery bank came in about a third smaller than a solar-only design would have required to survive the same overcast stretch — which paid for a meaningful share of the turbine. The generator has not run since commissioning. On a sheltered site we would have advised against the turbine; on this one it earns its keep.

Ready to lower your energy bill?

Get a free assessment and a costed proposal with a clear payback period.

Call usFree quote